Rachel Rothschild, a young law graduate in 2022, embarked on a groundbreaking journey that would shake the very foundation of environmental accountability. Armed with legal expertise and a fierce determination to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for its role in exacerbating climate change, Rothschild crafted a memo that proposed a radical strategy.
Foundational Work
In her memo, Rothschild presented a compelling argument: states had the power to compel oil and gas giants to bear the financial burden of environmental disasters such as devastating floods and wildfires—a consequence amplified by the relentless consumption of their products.
This visionary approach paved the way for what would soon become known as “climate superfund” laws. Last year, both New York and Vermont enacted these groundbreaking regulations based on Rothschild’s blueprint. The ripple effect could see up to six additional states embracing similar measures in the near future—a move that threatens to cost oil companies billions.
A Target Emerges
However, as Rachel Rothschild’s star rose in the legal realm, she unwittingly painted a target on her back. Alongside other legal professionals—ranging from attorneys to judges—who dared challenge the status quo, Rothschild found herself at the center of an insidious campaign orchestrated by a conservative group with deep ties to both the fossil fuel industry and remnants of the Trump administration.
Soon after Vermont signed off on its climate superfund legislation last June, this shadowy organization launched an assault on academic freedom by demanding access to Rothschild’s emails stored within University of Michigan servers—the institution where she now imparts legal wisdom.
Looming Threats
Under siege from relentless public records requests seeking insight into her communications regarding climate superfunds, Rachel Rothschild faced mounting pressure when her university was dragged into litigation due to its refusal to comply with demands for email disclosure. The situation escalated further when Government Accountability and Oversight insisted on deposing Ms. Rothschild—an intimidating tactic employed with calculated precision.
Despite protests from University officials asserting that private email exchanges should not fall under public scrutiny, they reluctantly instructed Rothschild to prepare for deposition—a move perceived by experts as an attempt to dissuade her and others from championing similar causes.
As shadows lengthen over Rachel’s once-promising career path, whispers of solidarity among legal circles echo softly against the backdrop of looming threats engineered by vested interests seeking silence where there ought be discourse.
Leave feedback about this