[HEADLINE]
Biden’s Potential Lifting of LNG Export Moratorium Raises Concerns About Energy Prices and Carbon Emissions, Industry Officials Push Back
[EXECUTIVE SUMMARY]
– The Biden administration released a draft report warning of potential negative impacts on Americans if the president’s moratorium on liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports is lifted.
– The report suggests that increased LNG exports could lead to a 30% rise in U.S. energy prices and contribute to carbon emissions.
– Energy industry officials dismiss the report as politically motivated, while environmental groups criticize it as weak.
– The analysis also highlights that boosting LNG exports could result in a significant increase in CO2 equivalent emissions by 2050.
– Industry groups argue that LNG exports can help offset emissions from coal use in other countries, reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions.
[MAIN STORY]
The Biden administration recently released a draft report that warns of potential negative impacts on Americans if the president’s moratorium on liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports is lifted. The report suggests that growth in LNG exports could cause U.S. energy prices to climb by as much as 30% in the coming years, while also contributing to carbon emissions.
Energy industry officials quickly dismissed the report as a “politically motivated” appeal to environmentalists. On the other hand, environmental groups criticized the report as “weak and half-hearted.” These divergent reactions highlight the ongoing debate surrounding the future of LNG exports in the United States.
The draft report, which is now open for a 60-day comment period, found that increasing LNG exports could lead to a rise in prices for U.S. consumers by as much as 30% in the near term. It stops short of recommending a full ban on LNG exports, recognizing the near-term demand from other countries. However, the report emphasizes the negative impacts on U.S. consumers, who could see energy prices rise by roughly $100 by 2050 as a result of tighter demand.
Furthermore, the analysis notes that increasing LNG exports beyond currently authorized levels could result in as much as 1.5 gigatons of CO2 equivalent emissions into the atmosphere by 2050, representing about 25% of the nation’s annual greenhouse gas emissions.
However, industry groups have pushed back on this assertion, arguing that the data set models for a scenario that does not consider the substitution of other forms of energy consumption, such as coal. In reality, LNG is expected to help offset emissions from coal use in the EU and elsewhere by as much as 50-60%, according to estimates from the International Energy Agency.
While the analysis indicates that increasing LNG exports would result in a roughly 0.2% rise in U.S. GDP, Energy Department officials caution that this increase does not necessarily correlate with a positive effect on broader public and consumer welfare.
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, in a statement released alongside the report, acknowledged that increasing LNG exports would generate wealth for the owners of export facilities and create jobs across the natural gas supply chain. However, she also suggested that the domestic price of natural gas would increase.
The debate around LNG exports comes at a time when the U.S. has become the world’s leading exporter of LNG, with sales of chilled natural gas experiencing significant growth. Current capacity is already set to double by the end of the decade due to ongoing projects. Additionally, the recent conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created new demand for U.S. allies in Europe and Japan, which heavily rely on imported energy.
Industry groups, such as the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the American Gas Association, strongly criticize the report and the Biden administration’s pause on LNG exports. NAM conducted a study that found nearly 1 million jobs would be threatened by the LNG pause over the next two decades. These groups argue that LNG exports play a crucial role in reducing emissions by providing cleaner energy alternatives to countries heavily reliant on higher emission sources.
On the other hand, environmental group Food & Water Watch slams the Biden administration for what it considers a weak report cautioning against LNG exports. The group calls on President Biden to ban further LNG exports and reject pending LNG permits before leaving office.
President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to undo the LNG pause once he takes office, has criticized the outgoing Biden administration for high costs and supply issues. He promises to “unleash” U.S. energy exports and cut energy prices for U.S. residents.
[US CONTEXT]
The United States has experienced a significant increase in LNG exports in recent years, becoming the world’s leading exporter. This growth has been driven by advancements in LNG technology and the discovery of vast natural gas reserves in the country. The debate over the impact of LNG exports on energy prices and carbon emissions is not new in the United States. Similar discussions have taken place in the past when considering the balance between economic benefits and environmental concerns.
[US MARKET/INDUSTRY ANALYSIS]
The potential lifting of the LNG export moratorium could have significant implications for the U.S. economy and American businesses. Increasing LNG exports would likely lead to higher energy prices for U.S. consumers, impacting households and businesses across the country. The rise in energy costs could have ripple effects on various sectors, such as manufacturing, transportation, and agriculture, which rely heavily on affordable energy sources. Additionally, the increase in LNG exports could create job opportunities in the natural gas supply chain, benefiting the industry and related sectors.
[EXPERT PERSPECTIVES]
American experts and industry leaders have differing viewpoints on the impact of LNG exports. Some argue that LNG exports can contribute to reducing global greenhouse gas emissions by displacing higher-emitting energy sources like coal. They emphasize the economic benefits and job creation associated with LNG exports. Others express concerns about the potential negative impacts on domestic energy prices and the environment. Academic research and local industry insights can provide further analysis and perspectives on the issue.
[INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS]
The debate over LNG exports also has implications for U.S. international relations. The increase in U.S. LNG exports has provided an alternative to countries heavily reliant on Russian piped gas, such as European allies. It has also diversified energy sources for import-dependent nations like Japan. The potential lifting of the export moratorium could enhance energy security for U.S. allies and strengthen diplomatic relationships.
[FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR AMERICA]
In the short term, the lifting of the LNG export moratorium could lead to increased economic activity, job creation, and improved energy security for the United States. However, it may also result in higher energy prices for American consumers. In the long term, the impact on U.S. carbon emissions and the environment will be a crucial factor in determining the overall sustainability of LNG exports.
[POLICY IMPLICATIONS]
The Biden administration’s decision on whether to lift the LNG export moratorium will have significant policy implications. It will shape the direction of U.S. energy policy, influence economic growth, and impact the environment. The government’s response to the draft report and its consideration of public comments will be vital in determining the final decision. Legislative and regulatory actions may also be taken to address the potential impacts of LNG exports on energy prices, carbon emissions, and consumer welfare.
[KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR US AUDIENCE]
– Lifting the moratorium on LNG exports could lead to higher energy prices for U.S. consumers.
– Increased LNG exports may contribute to carbon emissions, but they can also help reduce emissions from coal use in other countries.
– The debate over LNG exports involves balancing economic benefits, job creation, and environmental concerns.
– The decision on LNG exports will have implications for U.S. international relations and energy security.
– The Biden administration’s policy on LNG exports will shape the future of U.S. energy and impact various sectors of the economy.
[SOURCE ATTRIBUTION]
Original Content: Fox News
URL: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wrong-headed-energy-industry-leaders-blast-biden-admin-report-natural-gas-exports
Published: 2024-12-18T17:22:14Z
[HEADLINE]
Biden’s Potential Lifting of LNG Export Moratorium Could Impact American Energy Prices and Carbon Emissions, According to Report
[EXECUTIVE SUMMARY]
– Biden administration releases draft report warning of negative impacts if LNG export moratorium is lifted
– Report suggests energy prices could rise by 30% and contribute to carbon emissions
– Energy industry officials dismiss report as politically motivated, while environmental groups criticize it as weak
– Increasing LNG exports could result in higher energy prices for US consumers and a rise in greenhouse gas emissions
– Industry groups argue that LNG exports help reduce emissions and provide cleaner energy alternatives
– Lifted moratorium could threaten nearly 1 million jobs and cause uncertainty in the market
[MAIN STORY]
The Biden administration recently released a draft report that raises concerns about the potential negative impacts of lifting the moratorium on liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. The report suggests that increased LNG exports could lead to a 30% rise in energy prices for Americans and contribute to carbon emissions. However, the report has faced criticism from energy industry officials who see it as a politically motivated appeal to environmentalists. On the other hand, some environmental groups have criticized the report as weak and insufficient.
The draft report, which is open for a 60-day comment period, highlights the potential consequences of increasing LNG exports. It warns that US consumers could experience a significant rise in energy prices in the near-term, estimating an increase of roughly $100 by 2050. The report also projects that boosting LNG exports beyond current levels could result in approximately 1.5 gigatons of CO2 equivalent emissions by 2050, accounting for about 25% of the nation’s annual greenhouse gas emissions.
However, industry groups have pushed back against these findings. They argue that the report’s data models assume LNG exports do not substitute other forms of energy consumption, such as coal. In reality, LNG is expected to help offset emissions from coal use in the European Union and other regions by 50-60%, according to estimates from the International Energy Agency.
While the report acknowledges that increasing LNG exports would lead to a roughly 0.2% rise in US GDP, Energy Department officials caution that this does not necessarily correlate with a positive effect on broader public and consumer welfare. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, in a statement accompanying the report, acknowledged that increasing LNG exports would generate wealth and create jobs but suggested that the domestic price of natural gas would increase.
This analysis comes at a time when US sales of LNG have been booming. The US became the world’s top exporter of LNG in 2023, and current capacity is expected to double by the end of the decade. The demand for US LNG has been driven by factors such as Russia’s war in Ukraine, which has led US allies in Europe to seek alternative sources of gas, and Japan’s dependence on energy imports.
The report has faced backlash from natural gas advocates, who argue that it is a politically motivated attempt to justify the moratorium on LNG exports. Industry groups, such as the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the American Gas Association, have criticized the report and emphasized the role of LNG exports in reducing emissions and providing cleaner energy alternatives. NAM conducted a study that found nearly 1 million jobs would be threatened if the LNG pause remains in place.
On the other hand, some environmental groups, like Food & Water Watch, have criticized the report for not going far enough. They argue that LNG exports should be banned entirely to prevent further emissions and protect against the profit-driven agenda of fossil fuel corporations.
President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly pledged to reverse the LNG pause and “unleash” US energy exports. He has criticized the Biden administration for high energy costs and supply issues, promising to cut energy prices in half within one year of his inauguration. Sources familiar with the transition plans have indicated that Trump intends to immediately lift the LNG pause after taking office.
[US CONTEXT]
From a historical perspective, the debate over energy exports in the US is not new. The country has long grappled with balancing domestic energy needs with international demand and environmental concerns. In the past, the US has experienced both booms and busts in the energy industry, impacting different regions and demographics. The lifting of the LNG export moratorium could have significant implications for energy-producing states, such as Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana, as well as for consumers across the country.
Similar cases in the US include debates over the export of crude oil, where restrictions were lifted in 2015, leading to increased US oil exports. The decision to lift the moratorium on LNG exports is reminiscent of debates surrounding the Keystone XL pipeline, which faced opposition from environmental groups concerned about carbon emissions and potential oil spills.
[US MARKET/INDUSTRY ANALYSIS]
The potential lifting of the LNG export moratorium could have various impacts on the US economy and businesses. Increased LNG exports could lead to higher energy prices for US consumers, affecting households and industries that rely on natural gas. This could have implications for sectors such as manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. Energy-intensive industries could face increased costs, potentially impacting their competitiveness globally.
On the other hand, the lifting of the moratorium could benefit companies involved in LNG production and export. Export facilities and the natural gas supply chain could see increased economic activity and job creation. However, the uncertainty caused by the moratorium and potential policy changes could have negative effects on the market and investor confidence. The volatility in the energy sector could impact investment decisions and long-term planning.
[EXPERT PERSPECTIVES]
American experts in the energy industry and academia have differing views on the potential impacts of lifting the LNG export moratorium. Some argue that increasing LNG exports would provide economic benefits, generate wealth, and create jobs. They emphasize the role of LNG in reducing emissions and providing cleaner energy alternatives. Others express concerns about the potential rise in energy prices for US consumers and the impact on domestic supply. These experts highlight the need to consider the broader public and consumer welfare when evaluating the effects of LNG exports.
Local industry insights also shed light on the potential consequences of lifting the moratorium. Energy producers in states with significant natural gas reserves may see increased demand and higher prices for their resources. However, concerns about the environmental impact of increased LNG exports and the need to transition to cleaner energy sources are also prevalent within local industry circles.
[INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS]
The lifting of the LNG export moratorium could have implications for US international relations. Increased LNG exports could strengthen US energy diplomacy and provide alternative sources of gas for countries seeking to diversify their energy supply. The demand for US LNG from European countries and Japan highlights the strategic importance of energy exports in geopolitical relationships.
The decision to lift the moratorium could also impact US-China relations. China is a major buyer of US LNG, and any policy changes in the US could affect this trade relationship. The US-EU relationship may also be influenced, as Europe seeks to reduce its reliance on Russian gas imports. The availability of US LNG could provide an opportunity for closer energy cooperation between the US and its European allies.
The global trade implications for America are significant. The US becoming a major LNG exporter has already reshaped the global energy landscape. Lifting the moratorium could further strengthen the US position in the global LNG market, potentially leading to changes in energy dynamics and trade flows.
[FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR AMERICA]
In the short term, the lifting of the LNG export moratorium could lead to increased economic activity in the energy sector, job creation, and potential benefits for energy producers. However, it may also result in higher energy prices for US consumers and increased carbon emissions. The future outlook for America will depend on how policymakers balance these conflicting factors and address concerns related to the environmental impact of increased LNG exports.
In the long term, the lifting of the moratorium could have broader implications for America’s energy strategy and transition to cleaner sources. It may prompt a reevaluation of the role of natural gas in the country’s energy mix and the need for stronger regulations and incentives to promote renewable energy. The potential scenarios for the US range from increased reliance on natural gas exports to a greater emphasis on domestic clean energy production.
[POLICY IMPLICATIONS]
The report’s findings and the debate surrounding the lifting of the LNG export moratorium are likely to influence US government response and policy decisions. The Biden administration may consider the concerns raised in the report and the perspectives of various stakeholders when formulating energy policies. Legislative considerations may include discussions on regulations, incentives, and potential limitations on LNG exports to balance economic and environmental interests.
The regulatory impact of lifting the moratorium could involve the review and potential revision of existing policies and permits related to LNG exports. Government agencies responsible for energy and environmental regulations may play a crucial role in shaping the future of LNG exports and addressing the concerns raised in the report.
[KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR US AUDIENCE]
– Lifting the LNG export moratorium could impact energy prices and carbon emissions in the US
– Increased LNG exports may lead to higher energy costs for consumers and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions
– Industry groups argue that LNG exports help reduce emissions and provide cleaner energy alternatives
– The lifting of the moratorium could threaten jobs in the energy sector and create uncertainty in the market
– The decision could have implications for US international relations, including US-China and US-EU relationships
– Policymakers will need to balance economic interests with environmental concerns when addressing LNG exports
[SOURCE ATTRIBUTION]
Source: Fox News
URL: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wrong-headed-energy-industry-leaders-blast-biden-admin-report-natural-gas-exports
Published: 2024-12-18T17:22:14Z
[HEADLINE]
Biden’s Potential Lift on LNG Export Moratorium Raises Concerns about Energy Prices and Carbon Emissions, Ignites Debate in the US
[EXECUTIVE SUMMARY]
– The Biden administration’s draft report warns of negative impacts on Americans if the moratorium on liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports is lifted.
– The report suggests that increased LNG exports could cause a 30% rise in US energy prices and contribute to carbon emissions.
– Energy industry officials dismiss the report as politically motivated, while environmental groups criticize it as weak.
– The analysis notes that boosting LNG exports could result in a 0.2% rise in US GDP but may not have a positive effect on public welfare.
– The US is currently the world’s top LNG exporter, and its capacity is expected to double by the end of the decade.
[MAIN STORY]
The Biden administration’s release of a draft report warning of potential negative impacts on Americans if the moratorium on liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports is lifted has ignited a debate in the US. The report suggests that the growth in LNG exports could lead to a 30% increase in US energy prices and contribute to carbon emissions. However, the report has been met with pushback from energy industry officials who dismiss it as politically motivated and environmental groups who criticize it as weak.
The draft report, which is now open for a 60-day comment period, highlights the potential consequences of increasing LNG exports. It warns that US consumers could see a significant rise in energy prices, potentially reaching an increase of $100 by 2050. The report also estimates that boosting LNG exports beyond current levels could result in a 1.5 gigatons increase in CO2 equivalent emissions by 2050, accounting for around 25% of the nation’s annual greenhouse gas emissions.
Industry groups, however, have pushed back on this assertion. They argue that the data set models for a scenario that does not consider LNG as a substitute for other forms of energy consumption, such as coal. In reality, LNG is expected to help offset emissions from coal use in the EU and elsewhere by 50-60%, according to estimates from the International Energy Agency.
While the analysis found that increasing LNG exports would lead to a roughly 0.2% rise in US GDP, Energy Department officials emphasized that this increase does not necessarily correlate with a positive effect on broader public and consumer welfare. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, in a statement released alongside the report, acknowledged that increasing LNG exports would generate wealth for export facility owners and create jobs across the natural gas supply chain but suggested that the domestic price of natural gas would increase.
The report comes at a time when the US has become the world’s leading LNG exporter, with its sales of chilled natural gas booming. The country’s capacity is expected to double by the end of the decade on the back of current projects. The demand for US LNG has been fueled by Russia’s war in Ukraine, which has led US allies in Europe to seek alternative sources of gas.
The report has received backlash from natural gas advocates, such as the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), who argue that LNG exports play a crucial role in reducing emissions by providing cleaner energy alternatives. NAM conducted a study that found nearly 1 million jobs would be threatened if the LNG pause remains in place.
However, the report also faces criticism from environmental groups, like Food & Water Watch, who argue that it is weak and half-hearted. They call for a ban on further LNG exports and the rejection of pending LNG permits.
President-elect Trump has pledged to undo the LNG pause upon taking office and “unleash” US energy exports. He blames high costs and supply issues on the outgoing Biden administration and vows to cut energy prices by half within one year of his inauguration.
[US CONTEXT]
The US has experienced a significant transformation in its energy landscape in recent years. The rise in domestic natural gas production, primarily driven by the shale revolution, has positioned the US as a major player in the global LNG market. The country’s ability to export LNG has not only bolstered its economy but also has geopolitical implications, particularly in reducing the dependence of US allies on Russian gas.
Historically, the US has relied heavily on imported natural gas. However, the shale revolution, which unlocked vast reserves of natural gas trapped in shale formations through hydraulic fracturing, has led to a surge in domestic production. This has not only reduced the country’s reliance on imports but also created an opportunity for the US to become a major exporter.
The US has leveraged its LNG export capacity to strengthen its energy security and influence global energy markets. By exporting LNG to countries heavily dependent on Russian gas, such as those in Eastern Europe, the US has provided an alternative and diversified source of energy. This has helped these countries reduce their vulnerability to Russian energy dominance and increased their energy security.
The potential lifting of the LNG export moratorium under the Biden administration raises important questions about the future of US energy policy. It highlights the delicate balance between economic benefits, environmental considerations, and geopolitical implications. The US will need to navigate these complexities to ensure the continued growth of its LNG industry while addressing concerns about energy prices, carbon emissions, and public welfare.
[US MARKET/INDUSTRY ANALYSIS]
The US LNG industry has experienced remarkable growth in recent years. The country’s rise to become the world’s top LNG exporter has been driven by increased production, expanded export infrastructure, and growing demand from international markets.
The growth of the US LNG industry has had significant economic implications. It has created jobs across the natural gas supply chain, from exploration and production to transportation and export facilities. The industry has also generated wealth for export facility owners and investors.
However, the potential lifting of the LNG export moratorium could have mixed effects on the US economy. While increasing LNG exports could boost US GDP by around 0.2%, as noted in the draft report, it may not necessarily have a positive impact on broader public and consumer welfare. Energy prices could rise for US consumers, potentially reaching a 30% increase in the near-term and $100 increase by 2050.
The impact on American businesses will vary depending on their involvement in the LNG industry. Export facility owners and investors stand to benefit from increased exports, while industries that rely on affordable energy prices may face challenges. The potential rise in energy costs could impact sectors such as manufacturing, which heavily depend on affordable energy sources.
The US market trends in the LNG industry will be shaped by a combination of domestic policies, global energy demand, and competition from other LNG-exporting countries. The Biden administration’s approach to LNG exports, including the consideration of climate and economic impacts, will play a crucial role in shaping the industry’s future.
[EXPERT PERSPECTIVES]
American experts have differing views on the lifting of the LNG export moratorium. Industry representatives argue that LNG exports play a critical role in reducing emissions and providing cleaner energy alternatives. They emphasize the economic benefits and job creation associated with increased LNG exports.
On the other hand, environmental groups raise concerns about the carbon emissions associated with LNG exports and advocate for a ban on further exports. They argue that the potential rise in energy prices could negatively impact US consumers and call for a focus on renewable energy sources.
US academic research contributes to the debate by providing insights into the environmental and economic impacts of LNG exports. Studies analyze the potential carbon emissions, the role of LNG in reducing coal use, and the economic implications for different sectors of the economy.
Local industry insights from LNG producers, exporters, and consumers also provide valuable perspectives on the potential lifting of the export moratorium. These insights shed light on the practical challenges and opportunities associated with increased LNG exports and offer recommendations for sustainable and responsible growth in the industry.
[INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS]
The lifting of the LNG export moratorium has implications for US international relations, particularly in the context of energy security and geopolitics. The US has used LNG exports as a tool to reduce the dependence of its allies on Russian gas and strengthen their energy security.
By providing alternative and diversified sources of energy, the US has helped countries in Eastern Europe and Japan reduce their vulnerability to Russian energy dominance. This has not only enhanced their energy security but also strengthened their strategic partnerships with the US.
The potential lifting of the moratorium could impact US-China relations, as China is one of the largest importers of US LNG. Changes in the US approach to LNG exports could affect the dynamics of trade negotiations and energy cooperation between the two countries.
US-EU connections may also be influenced by the lifting of the moratorium. The EU has been actively seeking alternative sources of energy to reduce its reliance on Russian gas. Increased US LNG exports could support the EU’s diversification efforts and strengthen transatlantic energy cooperation.
Furthermore, global trade implications for America will be shaped by the competitiveness of US LNG in the international market. The US will need to navigate global energy dynamics, including competition from other LNG-exporting countries, to maintain its position as a leading exporter.
[FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR AMERICA]
In the short term, the lifting of the LNG export moratorium could lead to increased exports, job creation, and economic growth. However, it may also result in higher energy prices for US consumers and potential carbon emissions.
In the long term, the future of US LNG exports will depend on various factors, including domestic policies, global energy demand, technological advancements, and environmental considerations. The US will need to balance economic interests, environmental sustainability, and energy security to ensure the responsible growth of the LNG industry.
Potential scenarios for the US include a gradual increase in LNG exports while incorporating measures to mitigate environmental impacts, a more cautious approach that prioritizes domestic energy needs over exports, or a complete reversal of the moratorium under a different administration.
[POLICY IMPLICATIONS]
The Biden administration’s response to the draft report and the potential lifting of the LNG export moratorium will shape US energy policy and have regulatory implications. The administration will need to consider the economic, environmental, and geopolitical factors associated with LNG exports.
Legislative considerations may arise in the form of debates and discussions on the economic impacts, environmental regulations, and energy security implications of increased LNG exports. Policymakers will need to strike a balance between promoting economic growth, addressing climate concerns, and ensuring energy affordability for US consumers.
Regulatory impact may involve the development of guidelines and standards for responsible LNG exports, including carbon offset requirements, emissions reduction targets, and environmental impact assessments. Regulatory agencies will play a crucial role in monitoring and enforcing compliance with these regulations.
[KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR US AUDIENCE]
– The lifting of the LNG export moratorium under the Biden administration could have significant implications for US energy prices, carbon emissions, and international relations.
– Increased LNG exports may lead to higher energy costs for US consumers, potential carbon emissions, and job creation in the LNG industry.
– The US has used LNG exports to enhance energy security and reduce dependence on Russian gas for its allies.
– American experts have differing views on the lifting of the moratorium, with industry representatives highlighting the economic benefits and environmental groups raising concerns about carbon emissions.
– The future of US LNG exports will depend on multiple factors, including domestic policies, global energy demand, and competition from other LNG-exporting countries.
– The Biden administration’s response and regulatory actions will shape US energy policy and have legislative and regulatory implications.
– Striking a balance between economic interests, environmental sustainability, and energy security will be crucial in the future of the US LNG industry.
[SOURCE ATTRIBUTION]
Original Article: Fox News
URL: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wrong-headed-energy-industry-leaders-blast-biden-admin-report-natural-gas-exports
Published: 2024-12-18T17:22:14Z
Source: Fox News | Originally published: 2024-12-18T17:22:14Z | Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wrong-headed-energy-industry-leaders-blast-biden-admin-report-natural-gas-exports
Leave feedback about this